JZ Black Hole £1174$1995Black Hole £1174$1995
pros Excellent clarity, balancing low-end warmth with high-end transparency. Versatile when used with acoustic instruments or voices. Multi-pattern. cons Pattern switch feels a bit cheap. summary The
Black Hole may look quirky but it also gives a very honest
representation of what you put in front of it. I was particularly
impressed by its sense of focus. information £1173.83 including VAT. Funky Junk +44 (0)20 7281 4478. $1995. JZ Microphones +1 415 315 9397.
Photos too small? Click on photos, screenshots and diagrams in articles to open a Larger View gallery.
| JZ Black HoleLarge-diaphragm Condenser MicrophoneReviews : Microphone
It's easy to see where the Black Hole gets its name, but this novel microphone isn't all about appearances... Paul White  The
Black Hole's unique shockmount is eye-catching. In use it works as well
as conventional designs and it's arguably less cumbersome. The
Black Hole's unique shockmount is eye-catching. In use it works as well
as conventional designs and it's arguably less cumbersome.
If the name JZ
Microphones seems unfamiliar to you, that's probably because this
Latvian company was established as recently as September 2007, but they
still know something about building high-end mics: their chief designer
Juris Zarins worked with Violet Designs prior to setting up his own JZ
brand. The Black Hole — the first mic produced
by JZ — comes in a very solid wooden box, finished in a brown varnish
and with foam linings. If you're wondering about the name, one quick
look should set your mind at rest. A long, slotted aperture sits in the
centre of the long, flat mic body, not as a design statement (OK, not
only as a design statement) but to hold the shockmount, which is as
unusual-looking as the mic that it supports. Overall, the mic measures
203mm x 51mm x 28mm, which in some ways makes it appear rather like a
stretch-limo version of an AKG C414, but other than both mics being
multi-pattern, that is where the similarities end. Back To Black In
almost all respects, the Black Hole is nicely engineered. It's finished
in a fine black-crackle paint that gives it a vintage vibe. The steel
basket is also black, but two silver studs sit inside the opening to
secure the shockmount. The shockmount itself looks like a string of
rubber beads, and is simply squeezed to get its two mounting-points to
fit in between the studs. You need to ensure that the rubber cups in
the mounting points fit over the studs correctly, though, because the
mic could fall off the mount in the middle of a session if you don't! Although
the pattern switch itself is tucked away on the inside face of the
'hole', there are clear graphics on a silver background to show which
pattern is selected. The slide switch feels a bit cheap, though: I'm
sure it will work fine without wearing out, but it feels slightly
unrefined compared with the rest of the mic. There's a choice of
cardioid, figure-of-eight, and omni modes, produced by combining the
outputs from two separate 27mm-diameter back-to-back cardioid capsules.
This is a different approach from that of those mics that have both
capsules based around a common backplate. Peeking through the grille,
the diaphragms appear to be centre-terminated. According to the
technical info, the metallic layer is a special alloy, rather than pure
gold, and an unusual sputtering technique is used to control the way
the coating is deposited across the diaphragm. This seems to be
arranged as a series of discrete discs in concentric circles rather
than a continuous coating, but no extra information was given on this
process or its purported advantages. A standard XLR output connector
with gold-plated pins is fixed into the base of the microphone, and a
gold JZ logo denotes the 'hot' side of the mic in cardioid mode. Amplifying
the output from the capsule is a discrete Class-A preamp, presumably
using a FET, that has a claimed A-weighted self-noise of just 7.5dB. If
accurate, this is gratifyingly low. As the capsule is a true capacitor
design, the mic requires 48V phantom power to operate. The dynamic
range is specified as 128dB and the sensitivity as a healthy 21mV/Pa. A
frequency response of 20Hz20kHz is quoted, but without specifying
limits this means very little. A small graph included with the
publicity material shows a very gentle, wide hump centred around 150Hz
and only a dB or so in amplitude. There's an equally subtle presence
peak at 10kHz that's almost totally cancelled out in the
figure-of-eight position by the mic's natural high-frequency roll-off
in that mode. The response, then, is rather flatter than you'd normally
expect from a large-diaphragm studio mic, with a very subtle 'smile'
characteristic, which should make it a good all-rounder. Sum Of The Hole  Photos: Mark Ewing
Given the price of this mic, it clearly has to do
more for a living than impersonate a letter box, and I was pleased to
find that it does! Tests with spoken word revealed a clear,
well-focused sound that balances low-end warmth with high-end clarity,
and because there's isn't much in the way of coloration, the Black Hole
should work well as a general-purpose studio vocal mic where you have
to deal with lots of different singers; although a mic with more
pronounced characteristics may produce more artistically pleasing
results for a specific singer (if time is taken in auditioning to get
the right mic), the same characteristics might make it just as
unsuitable for another. The tonal character of the Black Hole in
cardioid mode is very similar to its tonality in figure-of-eight and
omni modes — that is, once you've allowed for the extra room ambience
that these patterns tend to capture. I took the
opportunity to test the shockmount while I was set up for vocal
recording and found it to be adequate, but I couldn't detect any real
advantage over the more conventional type, other than in space-saving.
I also checked for susceptibility to popping, and although any mic used
for close-miked vocals is probably best used with a pop shield, the
Black Hole seemed reasonably resistant to popping with a moderate
singing style. I was particularly impressed
with the Black Hole on acoustic guitar. The sound came across as
tonally well-balanced and without that annoying phasey quality that
many mics seem to end up capturing (even many of the good ones). I
suspect that the slight smile-curve helps here. Whatever the technical
reason, the mic turned in the kind of performance in this respect that
I'd normally associate with a good small-diaphragm mic. Although I
didn't have the opportunity to try it on acoustic piano, the way it
handled acoustic guitar made me wish I had, as I suspect it will
perform well in this role. It also put in a strong showing on
percussion, including some folk instruments. For example, I often use a
broomstick with bottle-tops nailed on to it, and this was captured very
much the way I heard it in the live room, with lots of clarity but at
the same time without the high-end jangle seeming excessively hyped.
Noise was never evident during these routine tests — bearing out the
suggestion in the published spec that this mic is rather quieter than
the average multi-pattern, large-diaphragm model. The Hole Truth I
don't personally find this microphone particularly attractive from a
visual standpoint, but I have to admit that its looks are distinctive.
I was half expecting an 'Emperor's New Clothes' experience, with the
novel cosmetics hiding a capable but unremarkable performance, but the
Black Hole surprised me. As a vocal mic, it won't be the best choice
for everyone — especially those who need tonal support — but when it
comes to balancing warmth with definition, and with minimal phasey
smearing, the mic turns in a very good performance indeed, on both
voice and acoustic instruments. It also exhibits a sensibly consistent
tonal balance across the three different polar patterns. The more you use it, the more the Black Hole draws you in! It doesn't have the market all to itself because £1000$2000
buys you a lot of microphone, including some studio favourites such as
the various AKG C414 models, but from what I've learned of its
capabilities, it deserves to be taken very seriously in that company.

Published in SOS December 2008 |